Communities That Care

Prevention; Ages 10–

Effectiveness

(Read the criteria for this rating)
  • Promising delinquency structure

Description

Communities That Care (CTC) is a prevention structure, grounded in science that gives communities the tools to address their adolescent health and behavior problems through a focus on empirically identified risk and protective factors. The CTC prevention planning system activates and trains a local coalition of stakeholders to develop and implement a science-based approach to prevention. CTC helps each community increase high-quality implementation of tested, effective preventive interventions that address elevated widespread risk factors for adolescent problem behaviors. Gang involvement is considered a risk factor for juvenile delinquency.

CTC guides the coalition to create a strategic community prevention plan designed to address the community's profile of risk and protection with tested, effective programs and to implement the chosen programs with fidelity. CTC instructs the coalition to monitor program implementation and to periodically reevaluate community levels of risk and protection and outcomes, and to make adjustments in prevention programming if indicated by the data. Implementation of CTC is organized into five stages, each with its own series of "benchmarks" and "milestones" to help guide and monitor implementation progress. CTC is installed in communities through a series of six training events delivered over the course of 6 to 12 months by certified CTC trainers.

In a 24-community study in which sites were randomly assigned to treatment and controls, CTC reduced the initiation of alcohol use, cigarette smoking, delinquency, and violence through the end of high school. Youth exposed to CTC from Grades 5 through 9 were significantly more likely to abstain from substance use and delinquency through Grade 12, even though few were exposed to evidence-based prevention programs after Grade 9. They were:

  • 32% more likely to have abstained from any drug use
  • 31% more likely to never have used gateway drugs (alcohol, cigarettes, marijuana)
  • 31% more likely to have abstained from alcohol use
  • 3% more likely to have abstained from cigarette smoking
  • 18% more likely to never have committed a delinquent act
  • 14% less likely to ever have committed a violent act

Risk Factors

Individual
Antisocial/delinquent beliefs
Gang involvement in adolescence
Physical violence/aggression
Family
Family history of problem behavior/criminal involvement
Family violence (child maltreatment, partner violence, conflict)
School
Low school attachment/bonding/motivation/commitment to school
Poor school attitude/performance; academic failure
Community
Availability and use of drugs in the neighborhood
Availability of firearms
Community disorganization
Low neighborhood attachment
Peer
Association with antisocial/aggressive/delinquent peers; high peer delinquency
Peer alcohol/drug use

Endorsements

Crime Solutions: Promising

Contact

Ms. Blair Brooke-Weiss
Social Development Research Group
University of Washington School of Social Work
Suite 401
9725 3rd Ave. NE
Seattle, WA 98115-2024
E-mail: bbrooke@myuw.net
Web site: www.communitiesthatcare.net

References

Hawkins, J. D., Oesterle, S., Brown, E. C., Arthur, M. W., Abbot, R. D., Fagan, A. A., & Catalano, R. F. (2009). Results of a type 2 translational research trial to prevent adolescent drug use and delinquency: A test of Communities That Care. Archives of Pediatric Adolescent Medicine, 163(9), 789-798.

Hawkins, J. D., Oesterle, S., Brown, E. C., Abbot, R. D., Catalano, R. F. (2014). Youth problem behaviors 8 years after implementing the Communities That Care prevention system. A community-randomized trial. JAMA Pediatrics, 168(2), 122-129.

Oesterle, S., Hawkins, J. D., Kuklinski, M. R., Fagan, A. A., Fleming, C., Rhew, I. C., Brown, E. C., Abbott, R. D., & Catalano, R. F. (2015). Effects of Communities that Care on males’ and females’ drug use and delinquency 9 years after baseline in a community-randomized trial. American Journal of Community Psychology, 56, 217-228.

Go directly to the main content section. Go directly to the main navigation menu.
Privacy Policy    Plug-Ins    Notice of Federal Funding and Federal Disclaimer    Accessibility
Access keys help